[IBU] FW: FW: Craft Beer in Iowa

Meyer, David david.j.meyer at pioneer.com
Wed Jan 30 14:26:01 CST 2008


Ditto. Maybe they are teh lamerz....
 
-DJ

________________________________

From: ibu-bounces at iowabrewersunion.org
[mailto:ibu-bounces at iowabrewersunion.org] On Behalf Of Mike Edwards
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 2:10 PM
To: Lenderts, Brian
Cc: ibu at iowabrewersunion.org
Subject: Re: [IBU] FW: FW: Craft Beer in Iowa


I contacted my reps, but didn't receive any replies yet. :(

Lenderts, Brian wrote: 

	Attached is my discussion w/ my local Rep - Walt Tomenga.  He
was
	interested in this upcoming legislation discussion.  
	
	
	BTW - If you don't contact your rep, you have no room to
complain if
	something doesn't get done...  They will be more inclined to act
with
	the more voices they hear.  It's not even a phone call or a trip
to
	someone's office.  It's an email!
	
	http://www.legis.state.ia.us/FindLeg/
	
	
	This communication is for use by the intended recipient and
contains
	information that may be Privileged, confidential or copyrighted
under
	applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are
hereby
	formally notified that any use, copying or distribution of this
e-mail,
	in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. Please notify the
sender by
	return e-mail and delete this e-mail from your system. Unless
explicitly
	and conspicuously designated as "E-Contract Intended", this
e-mail does
	not constitute a contract offer, a contract amendment, or an
acceptance
	of a contract offer. This e-mail does not constitute a consent
to the
	use of sender's contact information for direct marketing
purposes or for
	transfers of data to third parties.
	
	Francais Deutsch Italiano  Espanol  Portugues  Japanese  Chinese
Korean
	
	           http://www.DuPont.com/corp/email_disclaimer.html
	  

________________________________


Subject: 
RE: Limit the limit on beer - Legislation
From: 
"Lenderts, Brian" <brian.lenderts at pioneer.com>
<mailto:brian.lenderts at pioneer.com> 
Date: 
Wed, 30 Jan 2008 09:34:04 -0600
To: 
"Tomenga, Walt [LEGIS]" <Walt.Tomenga at legis.state.ia.us>
<mailto:Walt.Tomenga at legis.state.ia.us> 
To: 
"Tomenga, Walt [LEGIS]" <Walt.Tomenga at legis.state.ia.us>
<mailto:Walt.Tomenga at legis.state.ia.us> 

	Greetings Walt 
	
	 
	
	I have found the information you are looking for from a
confirming
	website (our own Iowa Code).
	
	 
	
	This is a link to the Iowa Code CHAPTER 123 ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE
CONTROL
	----> http://www.legis.state.ia.us/IACODE/1999SUPPLEMENT/123/
	
	 
	
	If you follow the link 123.3 (Definitions)
	(http://www.legis.state.ia.us/IACODE/1999SUPPLEMENT/123/3.html)
you will
	find the information to clarify this issue.  This is also
captured
	below.
	
	 
	
	You can see how Alcoholic liquor is defined as pretty much
anything over
	5% (including those beers 5% or greater) but excludes wine
entirely
	ranging from 5%-17%.  Such a fine stipulation was made for wine
	excluding it from the "Alcoholic liquor "definitions.  On the
contrary,
	any beer over 5% falls into this "Alcoholic liquor " region and
is so
	heavily taxed, most distributors will not deal with our Iowa
system.
	And of course you have a "premium" gourmet beverage which
already costs
	10x more than your frizzy yellow bud light.  You literally have
hundreds
	of beers over 5% wt which are excluded by these definitions.
Based on
	definitions, why not create a range for beer similar to wine?  I
believe
	most states are topping beer off at 15%.  In fact, Sam Adams
makes a
	really big beer (Utopia - 25%) but alas it would be most ideal
to simply
	capture the majority of the market (ranging up to 15%).
	
	 
	
	Realistically what is the concern?  Kids are not interested in
high
	alcohol beers.  They actually have flavor. And they cost more (I
paid
	$11 for a 4 pack of Sierra Nevada Bigfoot purchased in Sioux
Falls, SD
	this past summer).  In fact, if a kid wants to get a buyer and
get
	drunk, I'm sure they'll get the cheapest fizzy yellow beer
available.
	Realistically, a 750ml of Everclear can be purchased for dirt
cheap
	which I consider quite dangerous for any consumption.  And of
course you
	have wine which ranges up to 17% and is readily available in
Dahls,
	HyVees and quite a few convenience stores.  Why is there such a
	distinction for wine despite the higher alcohol content?  So if
you look
	at interest of such beers and cost, I don't believe there is a
strong
	concern with raising the alcohol content up to ~15%.
	
	 
	
	Why let this money venture out of state?  When I found Sierra
Nevada's
	Bigfoot beer (actually 9.4%) in South Dakota, I purchased 4 4pks
at $11
	a pop.  That was simply because I cannot find it here in Iowa
due to the
	cumbersome tax system for beers higher than 5%.  We are
surrounded by
	states (SD, MN, IL, MO, and NE) that have no distinction on the
alcohol
	content of beer (or allow a higher than 5% range).  I know
several
	individuals who make trips out of state and drop several hundred
dollars
	on these gourmet beers unavailable to Iowans.  In fact I'm
looking
	forward to a trip out to CA and anticipate bringing a few
beverages
	back.  Iowa is in the minority with this alcohol limit on beer.
	
	 
	
	Once again, I really appreciate your involvement in this issue.
I'm
	sure a great solution to this issue is available for discussion.
Please
	let me know how I can help any further.  
	
	 
	
	Brian Lenderts
	
	515 - 253 - 9657 
	
	5721 NW 93rd Johnston, IA
	
	 
	
	 
	
	3.  "Alcohol" means the product of distillation of any fermented
liquor
	rectified one or more times, whatever may be the origin thereof,
and
	includes synthetic ethyl alcohol. 
	
	5.  "Alcoholic liquor" or "intoxicating liquor" means the
varieties of
	liquor defined in subsections 3 and 33 which contain more than
five
	percent of alcohol by weight, beverages made as described in
subsection
	7 which beverages contain more than five percent of alcohol by
weight
	but which are not wine as defined in subsection 37, and every
other
	liquid or solid, patented or not, containing spirits and every
beverage
	obtained by the process described in subsection 37 containing
more than
	seventeen percent alcohol by weight, and susceptible of being
consumed
	by a human being, for beverage purposes. Alcohol manufactured in
this
	state for use as fuel pursuant to an experimental distilled
spirits
	plant permit or its equivalent issued by the federal bureau of
alcohol,
	tobacco and firearms is not an "alcoholic liquor". 
	
	7.  "Beer" means any liquid capable of being used for beverage
purposes
	made by the fermentation of an infusion in potable water of
barley,
	malt, and hops, with or without unmalted grains or decorticated
and
	degerminated grains or made by the fermentation of or by
distillation of
	the fermented products of fruit, fruit extracts, or other
agricultural
	products, containing more than one-half of one percent of
alcohol by
	volume but not more than five percent of alcohol by weight but
not
	including mixed drinks or cocktails mixed on the premises. 
	
	33.  "Spirits" means any beverage which contains alcohol
obtained by
	distillation mixed with drinkable water and other substances in
	solution, including, but not limited to, brandy, rum, whisky,
and gin.
	
	 
	
	37.  "Wine" means any beverage containing more than five percent
but not
	more than seventeen percent of alcohol by weight obtained by the
	fermentation of the natural sugar contents of fruits or other
	agricultural products but excluding any product containing
alcohol
	derived from malt or by the distillation process from grain,
cereal,
	molasses or cactus. 
	
	 
	
	 
	
	  _____  
	
	From: Tomenga, Walt [LEGIS]
[mailto:Walt.Tomenga at legis.state.ia.us] 
	Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 3:58 PM
	To: Lenderts, Brian
	Subject: RE: Limit the limit on beer - Legislation
	
	 
	
	Dear Mr. Lenderts:
	
	 
	
	Thanks for taking the time to write on an interesting issue,
especially
	as micro-brewing seems to be a growing industry.  I don't mean
to seem
	ignorant on the issue, but how is wine distribution regulated as
	differentiated from beer?  Is non-fortified wine classified as
liquor as
	well?  I will study Rep. Zirkelback's legislation when it is
introduced
	and take your comments into account when I decide how to vote.
	
	 
	
	Regards,
	
	Walt Tomenga
	
	 
	
	  _____  
	
	From: Lenderts, Brian [mailto:brian.lenderts at pioneer.com] 
	Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 10:03 AM
	To: Tomenga, Walt [LEGIS]
	Subject: Limit the limit on beer - Legislation
	
	Mr. Tomenga
	
	 
	
	I am contacting you to voice my opinion on the need to change
the
	definition of BEER in Iowa's Alcoholic Beverage Control laws.
Currently,
	Beer is limited to 5% alcohol by weight. This is very antiquated
and
	incorrectly classifies many craft and micro brews as liquor.
Beer
	having alcohol content higher than 5% is not liquor by any
means.  This
	law forces beers with higher alcohol content to the state's
distribution
	system for liquor. While this system may work well for liquor,
it does
	not work as well for beer. As it stands, the current legislation
is both
	cumbersome and oppressive to hundreds of marketed products
higher than
	5% alcohol. Many breweries will not distribute their beer to
Iowa
	because of this system. It is not uncommon for beer aficionados
to stock
	up with craft beer when visiting Omaha, Kansas City,
Minneapolis, and
	Chicago, all of which have less onerous legislation for the
distribution
	of beer.  Why allow this money to leave the state?  Iowa
breweries and
	brew pubs are put at an unfair competitive disadvantage because
of this
	legislation.  They cannot compete with those same breweries from
Kansas
	City, Minneapolis, Chicago or Omaha all of which reside right
next door
	to Iowa.
	
	While I am not an attorney, I believe that revising this
legislation
	would be rather easy. Chapter 123 of the Iowa Code deals with
Alcoholic
	Beverage Control. Sections five and seven speak to the break
point of
	alcohol that differentiates beer from liquor. Changing five
percent to
	fifteen percent in these two sections would correct this archaic
	legislation. Perhaps there are additional sections of the Code
that will
	need to be changed. Anyway, I am of the understanding that Iowa
District
	31 Representative Ray Zirkelbach will be introducing such
legislation
	during this session.
	
	Walt, please looks over the attached website -
	http://www.liftthelimit.org/ - it really captures the essence of
this
	issue.  North Carolina recently passed similar legislation
raising their
	beer alcohol limit from 6% to 15%.  Hopefully Iowa can mimic
this
	effort.  http://www.popthecap.org/?page_id=2
	
	 
	
	 
	
	With many regards,
	
	Brian L. Lenderts
	
	Johnston, Iowa
	
	515 253-9657
	
	 
	
	This communication is for use by the intended recipient and
contains
	information that may be Privileged, confidential or copyrighted
under
	applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are
hereby
	formally notified that any use, copying or distribution of this
e-mail,
	in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. Please notify the
sender by
	return e-mail and delete this e-mail from your system. Unless
explicitly
	and conspicuously designated as "E-Contract Intended", this
e-mail does
	not constitute a contract offer, a contract amendment, or an
acceptance
	of a contract offer. This e-mail does not constitute a consent
to the
	use of sender's contact information for direct marketing
purposes or for
	transfers of data to third parties.
	 
	Francais Deutsch Italiano  Espanol  Portugues  Japanese  Chinese
Korean
	 
	           http://www.DuPont.com/corp/email_disclaimer.html
	  
	
________________________________


	_______________________________________________
	IBU mailing list
	IBU at iowabrewersunion.org
	http://www.iowabrewersunion.org/mailman/listinfo/ibu
	  


-- 
Mike Edwards
www.edwardsbrewing.com
There are 3 days until Bockfest 2008!
http://www.schellsbrewery.com/newsevents_info.php?id=6

This communication is for use by the intended recipient and contains
information that may be Privileged, confidential or copyrighted under
applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
formally notified that any use, copying or distribution of this e-mail,
in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender by
return e-mail and delete this e-mail from your system. Unless explicitly
and conspicuously designated as "E-Contract Intended", this e-mail does
not constitute a contract offer, a contract amendment, or an acceptance
of a contract offer. This e-mail does not constitute a consent to the
use of sender's contact information for direct marketing purposes or for
transfers of data to third parties.

Francais Deutsch Italiano  Espanol  Portugues  Japanese  Chinese  Korean

           http://www.DuPont.com/corp/email_disclaimer.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.iowabrewersunion.org/pipermail/ibu/attachments/20080130/c823edae/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the IBU mailing list